Special Adviser Media & Publicity to President Buhari, Femi Adesina,
was guest on Channels TV yesterday where he spoke on some national
topical issues.
During the interview, Adesina stated that President Buhari was the only one that can assess his Ministers as he was the one who assembled and assigned them to their various ministries. According to Adesina, the decision of President Buhari to re-jig his cabinet would be totally his decision.
"Let me refer you to the Good Book. It says, "who are you to judge another man’s servant? It is before his master that he either rises or falls." The President assembled that cabinet, he has timelines and deliverables for them. So he is the one who can judge and assess them. If he is going to re-jig that cabinet, it is going to be his decision, his perogative"he said
Read excepts from the interview below...
During the interview, Adesina stated that President Buhari was the only one that can assess his Ministers as he was the one who assembled and assigned them to their various ministries. According to Adesina, the decision of President Buhari to re-jig his cabinet would be totally his decision.
"Let me refer you to the Good Book. It says, "who are you to judge another man’s servant? It is before his master that he either rises or falls." The President assembled that cabinet, he has timelines and deliverables for them. So he is the one who can judge and assess them. If he is going to re-jig that cabinet, it is going to be his decision, his perogative"he said
Read excepts from the interview below...
Q:
Mr Adesina, do you think that it makes sense for the President to
represent a loan proposal that was thrown back at his chest?
A:Yes,
it makes sense to represent. You will notice that what the Senate said
was that, it needed more details about the bid for loan and it was not
that it rejected the idea completely. Now, on the basis of that, if
government did not represent, it won't show you as a serious government
in the first place. This is not a flippant government and before it
asked for that kind of loan, it did its homework properly, and if the
Senate says it needs more details, then more details would be provided
and the request would be represented.
Q:
Is the Presidency embarrassed by that singular decision by the national
assembly to throw that request back at the chest of the President,
saying, look give us more details?
A:It
is not about pride. It is not about individuals, it is about our
country. The Presidency is out to serve the people, those at the
Presidency are not serving themselves. If they were serving themselves,
we could be talking of embarrassment. But because the intention is to
serve the people, embarrassment does not come in at all.
Q:This
is not the first time we are hearing in the life of this government
that the National Assembly would say they are not impressed by the work
done by the aides of the President as regarding the economy. We heard
that on the 2015 budget, we are hearing it again on the loan request and
perhaps we are hearing it again on the MTEF proposal. Is this not an
indictment of some of the people that the President brought around
himself?
A:At
best, that is just an opinion. That is the opinion of the person in the
Senate who spoke, and he has a right to his opinion. It does not make
it gospel,it does not mean he is completely right. You do not know at
that particular time what is motivating that person to speak.
Q:You
would remember vividly that the crisis over the 2015 budget was not
just an opinion, it was a very big issue, and it has to do with the fact
that the false document was retrieved because it was not properly done
or some other projects were not properly added to it. Is that an
opinion, is that the way the presidency would look at it? And when we
say provide us the details in the first place, why would the presidency
not provide the necessary details before going ahead to the National
Assembly?
A:
At any given time, there are undercurrents and unless you know what
those undercurrents are, you may not have a complete picture of what is
happening. It is the undercurrent that you need to understand. We may
not be able to talk about those undercurrents now.
Q:
Do you understand that undercurrent could mean a clash between the
executive and the legislature, that the President is not handling the
politics side of business properly?
A:
I did not talk about any clash, but when you say politics, yes I meant
politics. But what should be at play now is national interest, the
interest of the Nigerian economy rather than politics. I just think
politics is coming too much into play rather than the interest of the
country, the economy and the interest of the ordinary people
.
Q: Professor Momoh says in the practical sense that we do not have an economic team.
.
Q: Professor Momoh says in the practical sense that we do not have an economic team.
A:
I heard him, but he has a right to his opinion. Before he walked out of
the studio, he whispered to me, "I know what you would say because I
have heard you say it several times that we have an economic team". Yes,
and I say it again, we have an economic team. So, if he thinks that
there is no economic team, it can only be his opinion because we know
the economic team that we have, headed by a Vice president, then we have
a Finance minister, Minister for Budget and National Planning, a
Central Bank governor is in place, an Economic Adviser to the president,
Trade and Investment Minister, we have different kinds of people at
different levels, and you say there is no team.
Q:
But the reality is we know some of those who compose that economic
team, but what Nigerians are pointing out is the competence of some of
these. Some people would say in other climes, when Nigeria entered into
recession, the team should have been disbanded in the first place
Q:
It is a subjective thing, you can’t talk of competence when you have
turbulence, it is like you are in an airplane and there is serious
turbulence and then you begin to say it is the pilot that is not
efficient. You are not considering maybe the weather, the atmosphere is
what is playing up, and the pilot needed to keep his head so that he
would steer the aircraft through that turbulence, so it is a similarity
that we have with the economy. Nigeria is going through troubled times
and we need clear headed people who would steer us through that time.
Q:
Some people would say that they are advising the President to re-jig
his cabinet. Is there a possibility of that happening in the coming
months?
A:
Let me refer you to the Good Book. It says, "who are you to judge
another man’s servant? It is before his master that he either rises or
falls." The President assembled that cabinet, he has timelines and
deliverables for them. So he is the one who can judge and assess them.
If he is going to re-jig that cabinet, it is going to be his decision,
his perogative.
Q:
When would the 2017 budget be presented to the National Assembly, and
people are wondering the same thing that happened to the 2016 budget may
happen to this 2017 budget.
A:
You would also agree that we are recording better timing. It was to
have come October 31, but it would come as soon as possible.
Q:
A lot of people talked about transparency, the issue of the money that
have been recovered. Nigerians need to know how much we have. If we are
talking about borrowing, what of the monies you said you have recovered?
Your government has said that we have recovered so many billions from
those who have stolen Nigeria's money, and we are talking about
borrowing again?
A:What
figure were we given? N87 billion and $300 million, that is the figure
that came through the Minister of Information in June. What does that
amount to? It was said that the Minister would continuously update that
figure. But the figure we have to work with now is N87 billion and $300
million, and we know that that is just a drop in the ocean.
No comments:
Post a Comment