HE National Assembly should be more
reticent when making laws. Its tendency has been to make laws for
their sake or to please the Executive. In the process it ignores the
Constitution. The Central Bank Act 2007, which may soon be a subject of
legal dispute, is a good example.
It became law on 25 May 2007, days to the end of the Obasanjo
administration. Its efforts at creating a new Central Bank, succeeded
largely in the emergence of an organisation that acquires some powers
of the National Assembly.
Section 3 of the CBN Act sets the tune. “In order to facilitate
the achievement of its mandate under this Act and the Banks and Other
Financial Institutions Act, and in line with the objectivity of
promoting continuity and stability in economic management, the bank
shall be an independent body in the discharge of its functions.”
In Section 6 (3a), the Central Bank Act presses further, “The Board shall be responsible for consideration and approval of the annual budget of the bank.”
This section is CBN’s explanation for not sending its budget to the
National Assembly. After failing in its duties, the Senate wants to
waste public funds in a legal pursuit of a matter that the CBN Act
settles.
Section 50 of the Act requires CBN to furnish the National Assembly
with its annual accounts and financial statements within two months of
the close of its financial year. CBN’s 2011 financial year closed on 31
December. Has the National Assembly asked for CBN’s 2011 accounts? Why
does the Senate ignore the law it made?
The National Assembly has all powers over Nigeria’s money according to the expansive provisions of Section 80 (4), “No
moneys shall be withdrawn from the Consolidated Revenue Fund or any
other public fund of the Federation, except in the manner prescribed by
the National Assembly.” Public money was used to raise the CBN’s
authorised capital to N100 billion from N300 million. What is the
fixation with the budget? The Constitution expects full accountability
to the National Assembly for use of public funds. CBN, therefore,
cannot be exempted as it uses public funds.
Blames are the National Assembly’s. It refuses to activate the powers Section 1 (3) of the Constitution, “If
any other law is inconsistent with the provisions of this Constitution,
this Constitution shall prevail, and that other law shall, to the
extent of the inconsistency, be void.” Its tango with CBN is avoidable with the supremacy of the Constitution over all our laws.
The National Assembly’s acceptance of the refusal of 32 other
federal agencies to subject themselves to its oversight functions,
questions its relevance.
No comments:
Post a Comment