Thursday, 20 February 2014

NUGA GAMES RESULTS..... check out your school!!!


participating-universities



RESULTS
ATHLETICS
Day 1 (Tuesday)
18/02/2014

RESULTS
UNIPORT 5,000Meters Female
ATBU 400m Hurdles Heat 1
UNIPORT 400m Hurdles Heat 2
UNILAG 800m Heat 1
UNIPORT 800m Heat 2
LAUTECH 5000m Final (Men)
UNIPORT Javelin Final(Female)
SQUASH
FEMALE
QUARTER FINAL
OAU AUTOMATIC QUALIFICATION
UNIMAID 0 -2 FUNAAB
FUTMINNA 0 -2 LAUTECH
UNIPORT AUTOMATIC QUALIFICATION
SEMI FINAL
OAU 1 – 2 FUNAAB
LAUTECH 0 – 2 UNIPORT
FINAL
FUNAAB 0 – 2 UNIPORT
HOCKEY
UNN 1 -1 IBB
OAU 1 – 0 BSU
IBB 1 – 1 UNN
FUNAAB 1 – 0 TASUED
UNN 1 – 1 IBB
UNIBEN 0 – 1 FUTO
FUTMINNA 1-0 UAM
UNN 0 – 2 OAU
CRICKET
UNILAG 120 runs VS FUNAAB 88 runs (Unilag won with 38 runs with 5 wickets at hand
SWIMMING
Female 200M Back Stroke
Gold - Uniport
Silver – Uniport
Bronze - U.I
(Not yet given officially)
Male 200M Back Stroke Final
Gold - Uniport
Silver - Uniport
Bronze - U.I
(Not yet given officially)
Female Medley Relay Final
Gold – Uniport
Silver – U.I
(Not yet given officially)
TUESDAY 18TH
200 meter freestyle men
UNIPORT - GOLD
UNIPORT - SILVER
UI - BRONZE
200 meter freestyle women
UNIPORT - GOLD
UNIPORT - SILVER
NAU - BRONZE
100 meter butterfly men
UNIPORT - GOLD
UNIPORT - SILVER
UNILORIN - BRONZE


SWIMMING
Female 200M Back Stroke
Gold - Uniport
Silver – Uniport
Bronze - U.I

Male 200M Back Stroke Final
Gold - Uniport
Silver - Uniport
Bronze - U.I
Female Medley Relay Final
Gold – Uniport
Silver – U.I


TABLE TENNIS
MALE
FUNAB VS UNIMAID S (3 – 0) (3 – 0) D (2 -3) FINAL (3 -1)
UNIZIK VS UNIBEN S(3 – 0) (2 – 2) D (3 – 1)
ABU VS FUTA S( 1 – 3) (3 – 1) D(0 – 3) FINAL (0 – 3)
UNIMAID VS UNIZIK S(0 – 3) (0 – 3) D(0 – 3)
UNIBEN VS FUNAB S(3 – 0) (0 – 3) D(0 – 3) S(3 – 1) (0 – 3)
FEMALE
AAUA VS UNIZIK S (O – 3) (3 – 0) D (3 – 0) FINAL (POSTPONED TILL)
BADMINTON
Men Singles
UNILORIN 2-1 UNIMAID

UNIMAID 2-0 UNIUYO
OAU 2-0 FUTMINA
FUTMINNA 0-2 UNILORIN
ADSU 2-0 UMYU
UNIMAID 2-0 UI
UNIUYO 0-2 OAU
UNIBEN 2-1 MOUAU
UNIPORT 0-2 UNILAG
OAU 0-2 ADSU
Female Singles
NDU 0-2 UNILAG
UNIAGRIC 2-0 OAU
BUK 2-1 BYE
UNN 0-2 KWARA STATE UNIVERSITY
UNIBEN 0 – 2 UNIZIK

VOLLEYBALL
MALE
LAUTECH VS KOSU ( 3 – 1)
ABU VS FUTO (3 – 0)
UNILAG VS NSU (3 – 0)

FEMALE
UI VS UNN (3 – 0)
UNIBEN VS OAU (3 – 1)

HANDBALL
MALE
ABU 12 – 11 UNIUYO
OAU 18 – 9 FUTMINNA
KSU 17 – 15 UNN
TASUED 7 – 11 NDU
UNIBEN 9 – 9 UNIMAID
KSU 15 – 8 EKSU
FEMALE
TASUED 5 – 3 UNIUYO
OAU 15 – 4 FUTO
LAUTECH 9 – 2 UNIZIK
KSU 18 – 0 OOU
UNIMAID 4 – 14 KSU
ABU 7 – 1 OOU

BASKET BALL
MALE
UNIJOS 36 – 34 NDU
FUTMINNA 55 – 51 OAU
UNILAG 29 – 22 UAN
FEMALE
BIU 22 – 29 AAUA
ABU 26 – 12 OAU

LAWN TENNIS
MALE
UI VS OAU (4 – 6, 6 – 2, 6 – 1)
DELSU VS UNIJOS (6 – 2, 7 – 6)
FUTMINNA VS LAUTECH (7 – 5,6 – 3)
FEMALE
UNIMAID VS UNIBEN (6 – 1, 6 – 2)
FUTA VS OAU (6 – 1, 6 – 0)

Wednesday, 19 February 2014

NUGA OAU 2014 Opening Ceremony


OAU NUGA GAMES... Mascot Moving around


welcome ceremony 1 OAU NUGA Games 2014


Chimamanda Adichie writes on the anti-gay law-‘Why can’t he just be like everyone else?’

Chimamanda Ngozi
Article written by award winning writer Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie titled ‘Why can’t he just be like everyone else?’ Find it below…
I will call him Sochukwuma. A thin, smiling boy who liked to play with us girls at the university primary school in Nsukka. We were young. We knew he was different, we said, ‘he’s not like the other boys.’ But his was a benign and unquestioned difference; it was simply what it was. We did not have a name for him. We did not know the word ‘gay.’ He was Sochukwuma and he was friendly and he played oga so well that his side always won.
In secondary school, some boys in his class tried to throw Sochukwuma off a second floor balcony. They were strapping teenagers who had learned to notice, and fear, difference. They had a name for him. Homo. They mocked him because his hips swayed when he walked and his hands fluttered when he spoke. He brushed away their taunts, silently, sometimes grinning an uncomfortable grin. He must have wished that he could be what they wanted him to be. I imagine now how helplessly lonely he must have felt. The boys often asked, “Why can’t he just be like everyone else?”

Possible answers to that question include ‘because he is abnormal,’ ‘because he is a sinner, ‘because he chose the lifestyle.’ But the truest answer is ‘We don’t know.’ There is humility and humanity in accepting that there are things we simply don’t know. At the age of 8, Sochukwuma was obviously different. It was not about sex, because it could not possibly have been – his hormones were of course not yet fully formed – but it was an awareness of himself, and other children’s awareness of him, as different. He could not have ‘chosen the lifestyle’ because he was too young to do so. And why would he – or anybody – choose to be homosexual in a world that makes life so difficult for homosexuals?
The new law that criminalizes homosexuality is popular among Nigerians. But it shows a failure of our democracy, because the mark of a true democracy is not in the rule of its majority but in the protection of its minority – otherwise mob justice would be considered democratic. The law is also unconstitutional, ambiguous, and a strange priority in a country with so many real problems. Above all else, however, it is unjust. Even if this was not a country of abysmal electricity supply where university graduates are barely literate and people die of easily-treatable causes and Boko Haram commits casual mass murders, this law would still be unjust. We cannot be a just society unless we are able to accommodate benign difference, accept benign difference, live and let live. We may not understand homosexuality, we may find it personally abhorrent but our response cannot be to criminalize it.
A crime is a crime for a reason. A crime has victims. A crime harms society. On what basis is homosexuality a crime? Adults do no harm to society in how they love and whom they love. This is a law that will not prevent crime, but will, instead, lead to crimes of violence: there are already, in different parts of Nigeria, attacks on people ‘suspected’ of being gay. Ours is a society where men are openly affectionate with one another. Men hold hands. Men hug each other. Shall we now arrest friends who share a hotel room, or who walk side by side? How do we determine the clunky expressions in the law – ‘mutually beneficial,’ ‘directly or indirectly?’
Many Nigerians support the law because they believe the Bible condemns homosexuality. The Bible can be a basis for how we choose to live our personal lives, but it cannot be a basis for the laws we pass, not only because the holy books of different religions do not have equal significance for all Nigerians but also because the holy books are read differently by different people. The Bible, for example, also condemns fornication and adultery and divorce, but they are not crimes.
For supporters of the law, there seems to be something about homosexuality that sets it apart. A sense that it is not ‘normal.’ If we are part of a majority group, we tend to think others in minority groups are abnormal, not because they have done anything wrong, but because we have defined normal to be what we are and since they are not like us, then they are abnormal. Supporters of the law want a certain semblance of human homogeneity. But we cannot legislate into existence a world that does not exist: the truth of our human condition is that we are a diverse, multi-faceted species. The measure of our humanity lies, in part, in how we think of those different from us. We cannot – should not – have empathy only for people who are like us.
Some supporters of the law have asked – what is next, a marriage between a man and a dog?’ Or ‘have you seen animals being gay?’ (Actually, studies show that there is homosexual behavior in many species of animals.) But, quite simply, people are not dogs, and to accept the premise – that a homosexual is comparable to an animal – is inhumane. We cannot reduce the humanity of our fellow men and women because of how and who they love. Some animals eat their own kind, others desert their young. Shall we follow those examples, too?
Other supporters suggest that gay men sexually abuse little boys. But pedophilia and homosexuality are two very different things. There are men who abuse little girls, and women who abuse little boys, and we do not presume that they do it because they are heterosexuals. Child molestation is an ugly crime that is committed by both straight and gay adults (this is why it is a crime: children, by virtue of being non-adults, require protection and are unable to give sexual consent).
There has also been some nationalist posturing among supporters of the law. Homosexuality is ‘unafrican,’ they say, and we will not become like the west. The west is not exactly a homosexual haven; acts of discrimination against homosexuals are not uncommon in the US and Europe. But it is the idea of ‘unafricanness’ that is truly insidious. Sochukwuma was born of Igbo parents and had Igbo grandparents and Igbo great-grandparents. He was born a person who would romantically love other men. Many Nigerians know somebody like him. The boy who behaved like a girl. The girl who behaved like a boy. The effeminate man. The unusual woman. These were people we knew, people like us, born and raised on African soil. How then are they ‘unafrican?’
If anything, it is the passage of the law itself that is ‘unafrican.’ It goes against the values of tolerance and ‘live and let live’ that are part of many African cultures. (In 1970s Igboland, Area Scatter was a popular musician, a man who dressed like a woman, wore makeup, plaited his hair. We don’t know if he was gay – I think he was – but if he performed today, he could conceivably be sentenced to fourteen years in prison. For being who he is.) And it is informed not by a home-grown debate but by a cynically borrowed one: we turned on CNN and heard western countries debating ‘same sex marriage’ and we decided that we, too, would pass a law banning same sex marriage. Where, in Nigeria, whose constitution defines marriage as being between a man and a woman, has any homosexual asked for same-sex marriage?
This is an unjust law. It should be repealed. Throughout history, many inhumane laws have been passed, and have subsequently been repealed. Barack Obama, for example, would not be here today had his parents obeyed American laws that criminalized marriage between blacks and whites.
An acquaintance recently asked me, ‘if you support gays, how would you have been born?’ Of course, there were gay Nigerians when I was conceived. Gay people have existed as long as humans have existed. They have always been a small percentage of the human population. We don’t know why. What matters is this: Sochukwuma is a Nigerian and his existence is not a crime.

Tuesday, 18 February 2014

3 Things That Make Your Resume Less Effective

Resume

If you are not receiving a response back from employers about the resume you submitted, there could be a variety of reasons. Perhaps you do not have the particular qualifications the employer is seeking. Or, perhaps you are not properly communicating your strengths, experience, and skills.
Related: The Worst Resume Advice I’ve EVER Heard

Take a hard look at your resume and revamp it for effectiveness. Imagine you’re in the elevator with Donald Trump (or another CEO) heading up to the 18th floor and you had only 30 seconds to make your pitch, what would you say? If an employer cannot see what you have to offer or understand how your particular experience and skills are applicable to the job, you are not going to receive that callback to come in for an interview.
Common culprits that make a resume less effective include:

1. Poor Opening

If your resume starts with an “Objective” indicating what you are looking for rather than what you have to offer to an employer, you have already lost points right there. Even if your resume does start with a “Summary of Qualifications” or something similar to that effect, you have to ask, “Does it immediately and clearly tell the employer why I’m the right fit for the job?” An effective opening creates a theme that says, “Here is what I am best at.” Then, prove it by showcasing your accomplishments in your various jobs.

2. Not Using It As A Marketing Tool

A resume is used to help get your foot in the door with an employer. It is not a legal document and there is no need to include information that is irrelevant. The more irrelevant information you put on your resume, the easier it will be for an employer to come to the conclusion that you are not an appropriate candidate for the job. Use your resume to help demonstrate particular accomplishments, experiences, and skills that the employer can benefit from. Your mission is to simply put out a sufficient amount of information to garner the employer’s interest. Save details for the interview.

It is similar to when you view a movie trailer – it contains highlights of just enough information to entice you to want to view the movie, but it doesn’t tell the full story. Adding information that does not provide impact immediately on a resume is like viewing dull scenes in the movie trailer, making the overall package less effective.

3. Inappropriate Personal Information

Some personal information, such as hobbies, may be explicitly placed on the resume to help tell the employer more about your character. However, if what you list is unprofessional and inappropriate for the profession, it can ruin your shot at making a good impression with the employer. At the same time, there are instances when personal information is included without you fully realizing it. For instance, be cautious of your e-mail address. Your username or domain for the e-mail address can give off the wrong impression if it reads something similar to, “partyanimal@…” or “… @peoplehater.”

If you are including a website or blog address, make sure the information you have on it is appropriate and relevant for the job. Also, even if you are not publicizing digital information, employers may be screening your activity on sites like LinkedIn, Twitter, and Facebook, so check your privacy settings or make sure what’s on your public profile is appropriate for a potential employer to see.

Securing an employer’s attention is more challenging today. There are many qualified candidates available on the market for employers to select from. Make sure your resume shows impact from the start by telling the employer why you are the right fit for the job. Demonstrate what you have accomplished to show for it, and present a clean digital trail on the Internet for an appropriate impression.

Avoid These Rookie Interview Mistakes



I recently had a conversation with a hiring manager who personally interviewed 300+ people in the last 2 years. We discussed how uncomfortable it is when people make some truly rookie interview mistakes. People think the interviewer has the easy job, but it's just as stressful for them. It's not fun to watch someone make a mistake in an interview that you know is costing them the job. Trying to keep a poker face and finishing the interview can be tough. Here are some of the top mistakes we both have seen first-hand:
  1. Failing to do any research on the company so they are unable to answer the most basic question, "Tell me what you know about us?"
  2. Making the first question when it's their turn to ask questions, "What's the job pay?"
  3. Showing up under-dressed, looking disheveled and chewing gum.
  4. Arriving clearly hungover, sick, and smelling of booze.
  5. Taking calls and/or texting during the interview.
  6. Showing up late.
  7. Trash-talking a former employer.
  8. Swearing.
  9. Telling the employer what they think they are doing wrong in their business model without being asked for their opinion.
Interview = Thousands of dollars ($$$) on the line.
Interviews are hard to come by. Each time we fail to fully prepare for an interview, we are putting an entire year's salary (and more) on the line. Even if we aren't excited about the job, it's still worth it to prepare. Who knows? They may have a job that isn't posted that we'd be perfect for. Or, they may remember us when a job does come available that we're a better fit for. No matter what, there's no excuse for not preparing for any interview that comes our way.
And yet....
How many times have smart professionals chosen to "wing it" in an interview? I hear justification for the lack of preparation all the time. Things like:
"I'm better when I don't sound rehearsed."
Or, "I don't want to look to over-the-top about the opportunity."
They forget the cardinal rule: in an interview, you are a business-of-one and the employer is your customer. If you don't show them you're working hard to earn their business, why should they bother picking you?
I'm not suggesting we put the employer on a pedestal.
I'm saying the best way to show the hiring manager we want to work "with" them and not "for" them is to come to the table ready to prove ourselves worthy of a partnership.
Don't you agree?
I'm curious, what's other rookie mistakes have you all seen or heard of? Please share them in the comments below.


J.T. O'Donnell

Founder & CEO of CAREEREALISM.com | Creator & Coach at CareerHMO.com | Syndicated Author | Columnist | Blogger | Speaker

University of Ibadan’s Shameful Secret By Sonala Olumhense



University of Ibadan alumnus Ibukun Babarinde did the institution and Nigeria a remarkable favour last week. Shocked at what he found of Mellanby Hall’s toilet facilities, he pulled out a camera and took several scandalous pictures that were later published online.
First, let me disclose that I am also a UI product, and a Mellanbite. As a youngster, it was my biggest dream to go to Nigeria’s finest tertiary institution. My happiest day as a teenager was probably the day I laid my hands on my admission letter.
I recall a university that prided itself on its excellent academic tradition, but it was also a clean, well-maintained and safe campus. When I say, safe, I mean that you could walk and work anywhere on the campus at any time of the day or night.
I also mean that its facilities were exquisitely maintained. I do not recall toilet facilities, in any hall, library or faculty that you hesitated to walk into.
It would appear that Babarinde, who left the university in 2008, just six years ago, had the same general experience. His pictures show Mellanby Hall’s toilet facilities in a disgusting, embarrassing and dangerous state.
They show toilets so dirty it is difficult to believe that they belong to a public institution. I have seen cleaner toilets in Lagos markets. How can a student learn in such an environment?
In an essay I called “Nourished By The Trees,” I recalled a completely different experience. “Ibadan proved to be all that I had dreamed. I met famous people, joined fascinating clubs, drank of the wells of ideas on offer everywhere you turned, explored the huge central library, and walked long pathways that had been walked by many a remarkable intellectual. Sometimes, I did not want to go to bed: if you do not fall asleep, you do not wake up to find that an epochal life had been a dream.
“In the midst of all the excitement of the campus, it would take two years—two-thirds of my undergraduate programme—for the truth to sink in: the university was not really a place, and I was not there for a particular course of study. The university was a life, a culture, an atmosphere, an orientation, an awakening, a discovery. The university was an instrument, much like a pencil-sharpener, fashioned to develop blunt instruments into sharp tools.”
My favorite patch of real estate on campus was the Botanical Garden, which I introduced as a huge area of about 100 acres of tree samples from all over the world for botanical research.
“Each of the trees was dutifully identified, and a short legend told you the basics you needed to know about the plant. The size of those trees and the maintenance of the Garden told you that many people, for many years, had worked hard to see that generations of students and researchers benefited from their dream.
Along one side of the Garden ran a small, quiet brook, separated from the Garden by a small footpath…Sometimes, as you walked this path, you could hear small animals scurrying away as you approached. Birds sang in full-throated orchestras, each melody magnified and broadcast widely by the deep quiet. The Garden of Eden had to be somewhere nearby…
“It was in that final year in Ibadan and in that expertly-maintained Garden that I realized that excellence does not consist of anyone trying to do everything well. It is an individual ensuring that what he owes is faultless. If the commitment of that one person is to the larger society, indeed to posterity or time, or to doing the right thing for no other justification beyond its being right, the day arrives when there is somebody inspired by that effort. Thirty-one years ago, I was one such man wandering around in the shadows of someone’s commitment, thinking mine was the earth…”
Even after my graduation in 1978, I visited that garden for spiritual replenishment every chance I had. My last trip in the 1990s was complete disaster, as part of the property was being savagely destroyed for a construction project.
I left in a hurry, but that experience somehow prepared me for Babarinde’s devastating pictures which speak darkly of a disaster that is certainly not limited to one hall.
In “One Night In Legon, Ghana,” a 2005 essay for ‘The Campus Life,’ a publication of UI’s Advancement Centre, I recalled a 1976 visit of the Debating Club to the University of Legon.
I was a participant in the first of the two-day annual debating contest that year, and I commented on how similar both institutions were as we arrived at Legon’s Main Auditorium.
“As you know, Ghana and Nigeria, raised in the well-tested colonial cauldron of Britain, are similar in many respects,” I wrote. “I did not think that either of the universities in Ibadan or Legon saw themselves as being different from, or inferior to Oxford University. That evening, as the judges took the stage and the six speakers were being introduced, you could see just how similar they both were. We might as well have been in front of the standard Trenchard Hall crowd.”
One look at Babarinde’s pictures and I am ashamed I once put UI and Oxford in the same sentence. I know that times are hard, and that Nigerian universities are battling for the finances necessary to become competitive. Still, there is no excuse for the University of Ibadan, or a university—any university, anywhere—to have a single toilet facility of that nature. It is completely antithetical to the concept of a university and a university environment.
For three years, Professor Isaac Adewole, UI’s Vice-Chancellor, has spoken about repositioning the institution as Nigeria’s premier university, following the adoption of his proposals by the Council and the Senate.
The question is what those standards really are, and whether his plan is to drag the institution into the toilet. Is it really possible for you to advance high standards when you are so dirty?
The same question is present in most public and private establishments in Nigeria, where, despite heavy posturing, only Oga’s facilities are cleaned regularly.
I once worked for a newspaper where there was only one toilet for all of the staff, and I still have nightmares when I recall having to use it. Oga had his own toilet, and it sparkled. I worked for another newspaper where it became a priority to have excellent toilet facilities, and we worked hard to ensure them, but it was a different story when I visited several years later. Oga had his own toilet; it sparkled.
I have visited Nigeria’s presidential palace once in my life. I was shown to a visitor’s toilet which had been exquisitely finished in marble, but the place was awful because it lacked maintenance.
The moral of this story is that in Nigeria, Oga’s mission is often to make Oga happy so that he can go out and make speeches.
At UI, are Professor Adewole’s standards really superior to those shameful toilets at Mellanby?
I guess that when his guests complain they have encountered one of those facilities, he laughs and tells them they should have come to his own.
• Email: sonala.olumhense@gmail.com
• Twitter: @SonalaOlumhense

CHECK OUT YOUR SCHOOL'S PROGRESS IN THE NUGA GAMES




RESULTS
SWIMMING
Female 200M Back Stroke
Gold - Uniport
Silver – Uniport
Bronze - U.I

Male 200M Back Stroke Final
Gold - Uniport
Silver - Uniport
Bronze - U.I
Female Medley Relay Final
Gold – Uniport
Silver – U.I


TABLE TENNIS
MALE
FUNAB VS UNIMAID S (3 – 0) (3 – 0) D (2 -3) FINAL (3 -1)
UNIZIK VS UNIBEN S(3 – 0) (2 – 2) D (3 – 1)
ABU VS FUTA S( 1 – 3) (3 – 1) D(0 – 3) FINAL (0 – 3)
UNIMAID VS UNIZIK S(0 – 3) (0 – 3) D(0 – 3)
UNIBEN VS FUNAB S(3 – 0) (0 – 3) D(0 – 3) S(3 – 1) (0 – 3)
FEMALE
AAUA VS UNIZIK S (O – 3) (3 – 0) D (3 – 0) FINAL (POSTPONED TILL)
BADMINTON
Men Singles
UNILORIN 2-1 UNIMAID

UNIMAID 2-0 UNIUYO
OAU 2-0 FUTMINA
FUTMINNA 0-2 UNILORIN
ADSU 2-0 UMYU
UNIMAID 2-0 UI
UNIUYO 0-2 OAU
UNIBEN 2-1 MOUAU
UNIPORT 0-2 UNILAG
OAU 0-2 ADSU
Female Singles
NDU 0-2 UNILAG
UNIAGRIC 2-0 OAU
BUK 2-1 BYE
UNN 0-2 KWARA STATE UNIVERSITY
UNIBEN 0 – 2 UNIZIK

VOLLEYBALL
MALE
LAUTECH VS KOSU ( 3 – 1)
ABU VS FUTO (3 – 0)
UNILAG VS NSU (3 – 0)

FEMALE
UI VS UNN (3 – 0)
UNIBEN VS OAU (3 – 1)

HANDBALL
MALE
ABU 12 – 11 UNIUYO
OAU 18 – 9 FUTMINNA
KSU 17 – 15 UNN
TASUED 7 – 11 NDU
UNIBEN 9 – 9 UNIMAID
KSU 15 – 8 EKSU
FEMALE
TASUED 5 – 3 UNIUYO
OAU 15 – 4 FUTO
LAUTECH 9 – 2 UNIZIK
KSU 18 – 0 OOU
UNIMAID 4 – 14 KSU
ABU 7 – 1 OOU

BASKET BALL
MALE
UNIJOS 36 – 34 NDU
FUTMINNA 55 – 51 OAU
UNILAG 29 – 22 UAN
FEMALE
BIU 22 – 29 AAUA
ABU 26 – 12 OAU

LAWN TENNIS
MALE
UI VS OAU (4 – 6, 6 – 2, 6 – 1)
DELSU VS UNIJOS (6 – 2, 7 – 6)
FUTMINNA VS LAUTECH (7 – 5,6 – 3)
FEMALE
UNIMAID VS UNIBEN (6 – 1, 6 – 2)
FUTA VS OAU (6 – 1, 6 – 0)

NUGA 2014 CARNIVAL IN PIX- OAU Hosting